![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Equity Investment |
Given China and India's growth, should I rethink what a diversified portfolio looks like? |
I'm investing for a 30+ year horizon and I have a hypothesis that I should put the majority of my money in index funds tied to the stock markets of India (India Index Exchange Traded Note) and China (iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index) because those are economies of growth. I have heard that American companies such as GE, Gillete, P&G, Coca-Cola, etc. will benefit by serving these countries, but I still think that foreign firms based in those countries will better understand and take advantage of those markets. Furthermore, why should I assume that the American markets are any more safe for my money than China or India? From an education standpoint, the U.S. is not looking too competitive 20 or 30 years from now and that is not good for an economy that is dependent on innovation. For my equity investments I was thinking of this distribution: My biggest concern is the lack of a developed accounting industry over there. China has a high probability of major accounting fraud. If you're willing to take on that much risk then you could potentially get huge returns. Many international growth mutual funds have way outperformed their American counterparts, at least in recent years. Its true that India and China are likely to see massive growth in the next 10, 20, and 30 years. To answer your question, I would definately say that American markets are safer than Indian and Chineese markets due to the stability of our government. Especially in China, there is no way to tell what their government will be like in the future. I agree with your point about education....that is one area where America needs to pick up the pace. At my university, the graduate programs consist heavily of Asian and Indian students, much higher proportions that American students. Many of them will take their knowledge back to their country, so we experience a "brain drain" and a loss of human capital. This is not too bad thinking but trust my 20 + years of investing experience and never bet all your eggs on the same type of investment. Japan was taking over the world 20 years ago and see what happen now. You don't know if a change in regime, a natrual catastrophy or something else will come and disturb the EM markets like China or India. Furhermore market regulations and liquidity is deffinitly an issue in China nad India. I would say if you have 1%0 of your porfolio to loose be my guest and invest in high risk markets. I rather start with a good mix of US, EU stocks, some bonds, some market hedging funds, learn about call and put options as hedging tools, buy some Gold index funds, ladder your bonds, then start putting some $ into EM. I like your iShares FTSE, but I would look into dropping that within the next few years...possibly by 2010. That proposed distribution would be extremely risky, but you are certainly correct in your thinking. However, when you look at the potential of China and India you do not need to allocate 80% of your assets in order to enjoy the potential. About 10% to each location would be sufficient and 15% would be very aggressive. I do have to say that I am not greatly in favor of index funds. The capitalization weighting of them is detrimental to diversification of investments and also increases the specific risk of the portfolio. I am much more in favor of diversified mutual funds. Also I would not neglect investments in other parts of the world either although FAM does allocate a small portion of the portfolio to international stocks. You may want to consider further diversification as you grow your portfolio. not bad son. It is almost a universal agreement among the investment community that over the next 20 to 30 years both India and china will outperform a majority of other world economies. A couple of this you might want to consider are; |
| Tags |
| Fidelity Investment Fidelity Fund Exchange Traded Funds Equity Investment E-gold Ebullion Easy Money Easy Investing |
| Related information |
FMV is the price the stock can be bought & sold for in the open market. And yes, you are correct on the lower of cost or market presentation. ...unfortunately, everyone else here is wrong. To find the Net Cash from Investment activities we look at the Long-term or (Fixed) Assets on the Balance sheet. You look at specifically what happ... If the house hadn't burned, then I'd say you should get the bigger share. But didn't you have insurance? If not, well, you gambled and lost. It stinks, sure. But your brother isn... I think you will do well if the property is well located. Location, location, location are the top 3 things to consider with real estate. Schools are really important in Jersey, so is the school ... You can refer these sites... www.moneycontrol.com www.mouthshut.com (for reviews) ...I'm in the general area but don't know of anyone. You might want to try looking at website for Charlotte Observer, Creative Loafing, Charlotte Post or the Charlotte Magazine. You could ... Reported as spammer. ...There is not "one size fits all" answer to this question b/c the investing goals and parameters will differ widely between any pairing of 22 / 65 yr. old investors. What matters are the i... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |